The parable of this bad partner who is ruined regardless of all the woman denials try carried

Deuteronomy 22:21 chances are they shall enhance the damsel to the doorway of their dad’s house

Judges 19:2 with his concubine played the whore against him, and moved from him unto her dad’s home to Bethlehemjudah, and ended up being there four whole period.

Jeremiah 3:12-14,22 Go and proclaim these keywords toward the north, and say, Come Back, thou backsliding Israel, saith the father; and I won’t cause mine anger to-fall upon your: for I Will Be merciful, saith the father, and I cannot keep anger for everaˆ¦

Jeremiah 4:1,14 If thou wilt return, O Israel, saith god, return unto me: whenever thou wilt set aside thine abominations off my look, then shalt thou not removeaˆ¦

Jeremiah 8:4-6 Moreover thou shalt state unto all of them, therefore saith god

People say. –Better, So to speak, as adding a application of the figure. The direct reference will be Deuteronomy 24:4, which forbade the go back to the past spouse as an abomination, a law which the present breakthrough for the publication for the Law (2Kings 22:10-11) had most likely brought into importance. But there’s additionally an obvious allusion to your similar imagery in Hosea. There the prophet have done, actually or perhaps in parable, exactly what the rules got forbidden (Hosea 2:16; Hosea 3:3), and thus have conducted the actual probability of return additionally the hope of pardon. Jeremiah has got to perform a sterner component. also to result in the apostate adulteress at least believe that she have sinned also profoundly getting any claims to forgiveness. It may seem just as if Jehovah could not today come back to the love of their espousals, and make her exactly what she as soon as have been.

However come back once more in my experience, saith the Lord. –The statement sound inside the English like a grateful invite, and–in spite in the power of a lot interpreters who take it as an indignant exclamation, and return to me personally! an invite given in paradox, and equal to rejection, like that return happened to be out of the question–it must, I think, end up being thus taken. The prophet has actually, while we have experienced, the history of Hosea in his mind’s eye, where there was in fact these a call to return (Hosea 2:19; Hosea 3:3), as well as makes reference to it and repeats it in Jeremiah 3:7; Jeremiah 3:12; Jeremiah 3:14. It certainly implies a want of insight into the type of Jeremiah to suppose that the guy actually came before guys as proclaiming an irrevocable condemnation, excluding the possibility of repentance.

Verse 1. – they claim , etc.; because the margin of Authorized adaptation correctly states, the Hebrew just features “claiming.” Numerous ingenious attempts were made to explain this. Hitzig, as an instance, with Dr. Payne Smith, thinks that “stating” are a unique similar for “frankly,” “like,” or perhaps the want; although the Vulgate and Rashi, accompanied by De Wette and RosenmA?ller, presume an ellipsis, and make, “its typically stated,” or “i would state.” But much the absolute most organic way is to suppose that “saying” was a fragment associated with superscription regarding the prophecy, the rest that has been unintentionally put in ver. 6, and that we should look over, “and word-of god arrived unto me inside days of Josiah the master, saying.” Very J. D. Michaelis, Ewald, Graf, Naegelsbach. If a person store his girlfriend . The discussion are launched on laws of Deuteronomy 24:1-4, which forbade an Israelite who’d separated their spouse to need the lady once again, if inside the period she was basically hitched to another. The Jews had busted a still more sacred link, perhaps not as soon as merely, but continuously; they worshipped “gods lots of and lords numerous;” so they didn’t come with much longer any declare on Jehovah in advantage of his “covenant” together with group. Shall he come back , etc.? somewhat, Ought he to return? The power with the phrase was possible (compensation. Authorized Version of Genesis 34:7, “which thing ought never to be done”). Shall maybe not within the next term is quite would not . However return once more in my experience. Therefore Peshito, Targum, Vulgate, as well as the see might seem to get affirmed because of the invitations in vers. 12, 14, 22. But because it’s obviously contradictory because of the argument of this verse, and also as the verb may equally well be the infinitive and/or imperative, most recent commentators give, “And thinkest thou to come back if you ask me?” (practically, and going back to me! implying that the most idea try inconceivable). Most likely Jeremiah is conscious that most of the Jews are dissatisfied utilizing the religious disease from the country (comp. ver. 4).